Hot Swap growing, donors revolt, President Kamala? SCOTUS breakdown: Immunity, Chevron, Censorship

We are going to get President Kamala Harris. She's the only alternative ... They realize they can't sidestep Kamala Harris without offending a major constituency in the Democratic party. Equally important, maybe even more important, they would lose roughly a billion dollars of contributions to the Biden/Harris campaign if neither Biden or Harris is running at the top of the ticket.

The Democratic party is the ultimate insider party ... It's insiders picking insiders. And I think they've realized over the past week, in particular, that they cannot sidestep around Kamala Harris—both because it would be a slap in the face to her constituency and the money issue. So it's Kamala or bust for them.

I would still rather have Biden as Commander in Chief for the next six months than take the risk of putting Harris in there who's inexperienced, who's a lightweight, and who might want to prove how tough she is.

I don't think the Democrats are doing what they need to do in order to completely take the wind out of the sails of this narrative that Biden is not prepared or capable. And the only way that you can do that is by having him appear 24/7 in real-time in front of hundreds of millions of people as often as possible.

If you're the Democratic Party leaders and you are evaluating who to choose to replace Biden, the first thing you do is you have to double down on Biden. Because if you are neutral to negative on Biden, or passive, it's immediately interpreted as he's being swapped out, and you don't have time to pick the right candidate.

If Biden is not fit to run again, how is he fit to serve out the rest of his term as president?

In the last 24 hours, VP Harris' chances of being the Democratic nominee have gone from 18% to 50%. At the same time, President Biden has dropped from 66% to 28%.